28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires complete diversity among parties to invoke a federal court’s jurisdiction. The statute provides that a corporation is a citizen of its incorporating state and its principal place of business. In the 2010 case Hertz Corp. v. Friend, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted the “nerve center” test as the exclusive test for determining a corporation’s principal place of business. Although the Court intended to adopt a simple standard, applying the rule to dissolved and inactive corporations remains complex. This Note argues for a status-linked nerve center test. This approach is consistent with the text of § 1332 because it ensures that every corporation has a principal place of business under the dual citizenship requirements ...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Burnham v. Superior Court — despite producing a splintered vote with...
Article III confers the judicial power of the United States over controversies between “citizens” of...
Plaintiff brought action against defendant railroad in the federal district court for New Jersey dis...
28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires complete diversity among parties to invoke a federal court’s jurisdiction....
After the Supreme Court of the United States announced in Hertz Corp. v. Friend that a corporation’s...
Since the early 1990s, the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals have been divided on how to determine the ...
In 2011’s Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, the United States Supreme Court redefined...
On September 26, 2006, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United Haulers Association Inc. v. ...
This article challenges our persistent path dependence on defunct distinctions between corporations ...
In a unique decision, the Fifth Circuit in National Solid Waste Management Ass\u27n v. Pine Belt R...
This article attempts to articulate the due process test for general in personam jurisdiction. It fr...
Plaintiff, trustee in bankruptcy of a Delaware corporation, brought a contract action based on diver...
Assoc. for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc. v. Shapiro, 9 N.Y.2d 376, 214 N.Y.S.2d 388 (1...
The question of the citizenship of a foreign corporation as conferring jurisdiction upon a federal c...
The application of the separate interests test has thus far been attempted only with foreign entitie...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Burnham v. Superior Court — despite producing a splintered vote with...
Article III confers the judicial power of the United States over controversies between “citizens” of...
Plaintiff brought action against defendant railroad in the federal district court for New Jersey dis...
28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires complete diversity among parties to invoke a federal court’s jurisdiction....
After the Supreme Court of the United States announced in Hertz Corp. v. Friend that a corporation’s...
Since the early 1990s, the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals have been divided on how to determine the ...
In 2011’s Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, the United States Supreme Court redefined...
On September 26, 2006, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United Haulers Association Inc. v. ...
This article challenges our persistent path dependence on defunct distinctions between corporations ...
In a unique decision, the Fifth Circuit in National Solid Waste Management Ass\u27n v. Pine Belt R...
This article attempts to articulate the due process test for general in personam jurisdiction. It fr...
Plaintiff, trustee in bankruptcy of a Delaware corporation, brought a contract action based on diver...
Assoc. for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc. v. Shapiro, 9 N.Y.2d 376, 214 N.Y.S.2d 388 (1...
The question of the citizenship of a foreign corporation as conferring jurisdiction upon a federal c...
The application of the separate interests test has thus far been attempted only with foreign entitie...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Burnham v. Superior Court — despite producing a splintered vote with...
Article III confers the judicial power of the United States over controversies between “citizens” of...
Plaintiff brought action against defendant railroad in the federal district court for New Jersey dis...